Second generation faith

peter-preaching.jpg

We’ve all heard the saying from Francis of Assisi, “Preach the gospel at all times. If necessary use words.” He never said it.

I’m in Acts at the moment. It’s full of the witness of words. Peter at Pentecost; Stephen on trial; Phillip with the Ethiopian eunuch; Peter before Cornelius and his household; Paul wherever he went.

What did they say? Surprisingly nothing about being good. Theirs are not the sermons and exhortations of moralists.

According to CFD Moule,

This is precisely what distinguishes the New Testament Gospel from a great deal that has passed for Christian teaching ever since. The moment you get to “second-generation” Christians, the danger arises that they may forget the vital thing which changes life—the power of Jesus, crucified and risen—and preach and teach instead the results rather than the cause.

Evangelism in Acts starts with what God has done and what we have done to warrant his judgment.

Some people respond with ridicule and persecution. Others ask, “What must we do to be saved!” The answer is, Repent, be baptized and your sins will be forgiven and you will receive the Holy Spirit (Acs 2:37-38).

Why didn’t the apostles exhort their audience to try harder? They knew their best efforts had ended in shame and defeat. Only the death of Christ and his life through the Holy Spirit could transform them from cowards to bold witnesses.

Born to rule — a movement on the skids

KingdmRule.jpg

I’m still in New Zealand talking about movements. Tomorrow we’re in Palmerston North. Last stop Christchurch.

While I was here this story broke about the Destiny movement led by Bishop Brian Tamaki. It tells of the closure of its Brisbane congregation after the pastor and 90 people walked out.

They were upset about increasing demands for money by Bishop Tamaki in New Zealand. Tamaki is known within the movement as “the king”. As his number plate declares (above), he was born to rule.

Movements at a discount

PC101_top.jpg

Right now Aussies can pick up Movements at a 20% discount through Koorong Books.

New Zealand tour

IMG_0654.jpg

Here I am working hard on Auckland Harbour in preparation for a tour of New Zealand.

Thanks to Ian for making it possible. Although next time I’ll skip lunch before I go sailing. Most of it ended up in the harbour.

Don’t pass the torch!

floydmcclung.jpeg

Don’t pass the torch — start with it in their hands.
Floyd McClung

You’ve got to listen to Floyd on church planting movements to catch his heart for Africa and the world. Visit his blog to download the audio or video of his series on CPMs.

Movements and the shirtless dancing guy


Just three minutes from Derek Sivers on movements and the dancing guy. Some great transferable principles. Watch it and learn.

Then ask yourself is this a “movement” or a “fad”? The difference is everything.

These people are crazy

6a00e54eda628588330120a63a8d32970c-320wi.jpg

Dave Lawton reports in on what’s been happening at Alabaster House:

Starting with five young radicals I remember going to pray in parks at night with them as they started to dream of reaching broken kids with the gospel. Passion was high. So was their faith. There was no resource, no big budget, just big hearts.

A few years later we stand in awe of all that God has done. Many kids and young adults have encountered a loving Jesus community, come to faith, been baptised. I am always hearing stories of broken people discovering Jesus. It’s messy, edgy and fun. As a community of 60 to 70 they are now beginning to multiply new churches. They dream big and work on reaching one person at a time.

read on . . .

UPDATE

Check out their vision statement below (double click to get a good view). I’m weary and skeptical of most “vision statements”. I have a hunch these guys are different. . .

Alabaster House vision.jpg

Singapore workshop

The updated promo for the Movements workshop in Singapore on March 12, 2010. It has the location details added

Fierce conversations

David Mays has produced an other great summary of a significant book for leaders and team members: Fierce Conversations by Susan Scott.


“Fierce Conversations: Achieving Success at Work and in Life One Conversation at a Time” (Susan Scott)

Anglo-Catholics and Anglican decline

peter_corney.jpg

Peter Corney is a leading evangelical Anglican in Melbourne. He takes a look at Anglican decline and especially the decline of the Anglo-Catholic movement within the Anglican church.

Here is his (edited) list of trends that have contributed to Anglo-Catholic decline:

1. Anglo-Catholics drifted away from the credal and biblical orthodoxy of its founders and gradually embraced a reductionist liberal theology. Most people in ministry now who have been influenced by this movement could be more accurately described as “liberal catholic”.

In spite of its claims to be broad and open, Liberal theology is frequently intellectually narrow and provincial. It becomes trapped in the immediate landscape of the spirit of the age and what its host society finds plausible or implausible.

2. They allowed a recovered incarnational theology to become unbalanced. The idea of the importance of “presence”, particularly presence with the poor, eventually over-powered the importance of proclamation. So instead of a balance of “the whole gospel for the whole person” confidence in preaching was eroded and the link between word and deed fatally weakened. The inevitable eventually happened: preaching, evangelism and proclamation were devalued and diminished.

3. As reductionist liberalism ate the heart out of its theology, the distinctiveness of Anglo-Catholicism was left to depend more and more on its particular liturgical, symbolic and cultural expressions.

This style was well out of step with ordinary Australians and further marginalised Anglicanism from the mainstream of Australian life. We were fast becoming a boutique church.

4. Because the emotional tendency of the movement has been to look backwards to a very late-19th Century English expression of Anglicanism, the movement failed to assist the process of really grounding Anglicanism in Australian culture. The model of the English village church is a sentimental and anglophile vision that has been fostered by the movement and helped to alienate us from Australian culture.

5. They focussed on a pastoral maintenance model of ministry and so did not grow churches. The emphasis on the priestly role fed this trend.

6. Because of the tendency to look backwards nostalgically to the English village or cathedral model and ethos, and their commitment to more formality in worship, they were very slow to embrace contemporary and informal styles in worship and music. They were totally unprepared for the rejection of formality in the 70s and 80s by the “Boomers”.

7. The Parish Communion Movement of the 1920s and 30s was a child of Anglo-Catholicism. The idea was that the principal service of the day should be Holy Communion and that everyone should be present including youth and children. This view had several very negative effects:

(a) Other non-eucharistic services disappeared. This created a barrier for non-communicants and fringe people.

(b) Because it downplayed Sunday Schools, insisting children be in the whole service, children’s and youth ministry suffered.

8. The issue of women’s ordination created a crisis in the Anglo-Catholic movement. The traditionalists were opposed but their offspring, the liberal Catholics, were pro. As the traditionalists are now a minority, their bitter rearguard action failed. This has left many unhappy legacies and further weakened the movement.

Visit Peter’s blog for the full version.